Art should be appreciated/valued based on its merits, not on artist.

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Art should be appreciated/valued based on its merits, not on artist.

Re: Art should be appreciated/valued based on its merits, not on artist.

by Williamson » Thu Feb 05, 2026 7:29 am

The Art is not mean to do it work hard that's mean to do it work with perfectly and creative in best way. So appreciate it by judge its art skill.

Available here https://stylishshines.com/Cleaning Services in Vancouver BC

Re: Art should be appreciated/valued based on its merits, not on artist.

by FAQbala » Fri Sep 09, 2016 8:57 am

It is hard to measure the value of a piece of art.
Is it its warmth on your heart or just simply love?
This is a great topic to discuss to help us discover who we are.

Art should be appreciated/valued based on its merits, not on artist.

by CataCluj » Wed Jul 20, 2016 2:33 pm

I feel like very often some piece of art (paintings, music, photography, opera, theater, etc.) is appreciated because it was created by some famous artist, rather than because its own value/beauty/message/etc.
For example, during intermission, people often talk about the actors, rather than the subject/message of the show.
I think that's wrong, and I'm curious what you think.
Let me know if you think I should add other options to the poll (no guarantee though :-) )

Top