Page 1 of 1
Art should be appreciated/valued based on its merits, not on artist.
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2016 2:33 pm
by CataCluj
I feel like very often some piece of art (paintings, music, photography, opera, theater, etc.) is appreciated because it was created by some famous artist, rather than because its own value/beauty/message/etc.
For example, during intermission, people often talk about the actors, rather than the subject/message of the show.
I think that's wrong, and I'm curious what you think.
Let me know if you think I should add other options to the poll (no guarantee though

)
Re: Art should be appreciated/valued based on its merits, not on artist.
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 8:57 am
by FAQbala
It is hard to measure the value of a piece of art.
Is it its warmth on your heart or just simply love?
This is a great topic to discuss to help us discover who we are.
Re: Art should be appreciated/valued based on its merits, not on artist.
Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2026 9:05 am
by richerson
I appreciate how you tackle [subject] with a balanced approach. It's refreshing to see a nuanced perspective.
plab exam
Re: Art should be appreciated/valued based on its merits, not on artist.
Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2026 12:17 pm
by jenson
Hey, this day is too much good for me, since this time I am reading this enormous informative article here at my home. Thanks a lot for massive hard work
american sign language services fort lauderdale
Re: Art should be appreciated/valued based on its merits, not on artist.
Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2026 12:19 pm
by ThierryHenry
An outstanding blog post. I appreciate your great post. I visited your post and discovered a lot of methods.
ginger ale